Sto pro veritate

Travellrev, over at Aotearoa: a wider perspective, has had enough! Not for the first time, though, she’s made a few, presumably inadvertent, errors in her post. Since I’m banned from commenting over there, I thought I’d just post a corrected version here… Read more of this post

Cloudbusting

Seems Clare and the crew over at the Con Trail have discovered cloud-seeding!

How does cloud-seeding marry up with popular chemtrail theory?

  • ‘Chemtrails’ are long straight lines of ‘chemicals’ that spread out to form cirrus-like clouds.
    Cloud-seeding is done directly into clouds – no ‘line’s are created.
  • ‘Chemtrails’ contain aluminium, barium, and other miscellaneous chemical and biological agents
    Cloud-seeding uses silver iodine.
  • ‘Chemtrailing’ started in the late 1990s.
    Cloud-seeding has been around since the 1940s.

So cloud-seeding doesn’t look like ‘chemtrails’, doesn’t contain any of the chemicals that you’d expect to find in ‘chemtrails’, and pre-date the ‘chemtrail’ era by fifty years.

And on that last point, the guys over at Metabunk have even discovered that this specific cloud-seeding operation has been in existence since 1948.

To think, all that work the NWO has been doing on keeping chemtrails a secret, and then someone goes and puts an ad about it in the local paper!

Here’s Kate, singing about another weather modification technique

April Fools

Rose over at the CONTrail (and reposted by Clare, here) posts some info about an ‘anomaly over Christchurch’. Here’s the vid…

Wow. Massive blue glowing ‘vortexes’ over New Brighton? Freaky stuff.

What’s even freakier, to my mind, is that no-one else saw them. The original source of the YouTube vid ProfanityDubstepNZ, does state that the photos shown in the video were taken at 5am in the morning. His mate, Rudy P, who supplied the photos to ProfanityDubstepNZ says…

My Mum took these photos at about 5am on 29th March from her balcony on Scarborough Hill in Sumner Christchurch. The city lights you can see is New Brighton area. She said this thing stayed visible well into the day

ProfanityDubstepNZ tries to defend the lack of any corroborating witnesses by commenting…

Take in to fact that this happened at 5am in Christchurch, we were only hit by that 6.3 just over a month ago and it is said up to 200,000 people have left the city out of a population of not even 1,000,000 before the time, take it from me its a lot quieter around here so im thankful we have photo’s

The actual population of Christchurch is a bit under 400,000, so even if we accept half that number did leave the city after the quake (and haven’t returned), we’re still left with the fact that the only witness so far claimed that this anomaly was visible “well into the day”, and that not one of the remaining one-fifth of a million people remaining in the city spotted these huge glowing blue vortices hovering above the city’s eastern suburbs.

Naturally, chemtrails have to get involved. Says Bill Blyth

There also seems to be a faint line of a CT in one of the shots.4th pic down from the top.

That’s this photo. Crank up the levels, and you can see that the said chemtrail is, in fact, the window-frame of the room from where the photo was taken. (Also visible here, here and here.)

So, there are two possibilities:

On the one hand we have a youtube user whose mate’s mum took some photos of a quite extraordinary phenomenon. There really was an anomaly of some sort over New Brighton, but it was completely missed by the rest of the population, despite being visible into the daylight hours, when tens of thousands of people would have been passing directly underneath it (not to mention the many people who would’ve been awake and working at 5am anyway).

…or…

It’s just someone messing about with torches.

You decide.

One doesn’t have to be a geologist…

…but it would probably help. A comment posted by Barbara over at Rose’s Contrail site (and reproduced here by Clare at ChemtrailsNorthNZ), reads thus…

A friend of mine went canoeing in Lyttelton harbour recently with a companion who had lived in Lyttelton for years. he told me his companion took him to a new hot spring which had formed in the area of Cass Bay, after the Sept 2010 quake series began. It had not been there before. I have read a recent report saying that not only are there many hot springs that have “popped” up in the peninsula.. some of them are now boiling …

One doesnt have to be a geologist to connect the dots. I think that the volcano is indeed rumbling. Ruaumoko is coming to life. My only hope is that the authorities do the right thing and evacuate the area before many more lives are lost.

Now, I’m not sure what this ‘recent report’ refers to. Presumably it’s this…

I am attaching a pdf file which shows that geologists have been aware of and monitoring warm springs that have begun popping up in the christchurch for the past 25 years. The government and geologists cannot claim “no knowledge” of this. The published study shows this. Interestingly this publication in now very hard to find on the internet.. it was relatively easy to find up until two weeks ago.. makes one wonder why??

Neither Rose nor Clare bother to link to the aforementioned PDF (jauntily entitled “Hydrogeological implications of geology at the boundary of Banks Peninsula volcanic rock aquifers and Canterbury Plains fluvial gravel aquifers”), and apparently it’s “hard to find on the internet”. It does make wonder why, doesn’t it? Have the powers-that-be managed to nobble the internet so as to make this crucial information inaccessible to the worried public? Are ‘they’ covering things up? How could we circumvent their nefarious ways and track down a copy of said research?

How about typing the name of the article in Google? Ah, yes: fourth hit (no wonder it was hard to find!), full text PDF download from the New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics.

A read through of the article reveals that springs haven’t been “popping up” for the last 25 years, but have, in fact, been a known part of Banks Peninsula geology since they were first noted in 1884. Various drilling and surverys have revealed more warm water springs over the last hundred and something years. Nothing unusual there, then.

Of course, if new springs are ‘popping up’ now, post-earthquake, and they are ‘boiling’ as reported, that might be an indicator that something’s amiss, surely? The volcano is coming to life? What do the scientists say? Geonet have been kind enough to answer questions on the Banks Peninsula Volcano facebook page (yes, of course there’s a facebook page for that). A few Geonet comments worth noting…

…there have been reports that springs in the Lyttelton area have warmed up, but this is not a surprise following a large earthquake. After the 4 Sept earthquake, changes in springs and bores were seen all across Canterbury and beyond – even as far as parts of North Island. The shaking opens up small cracks and pores in the sediments beneath the earth’s surface and can let water move around – potentially bringing warm water from depth up through normally cool springs. After 4 September, GNS monitored bores around the country to watch the changes. So although the effects are likely to be most obvious near to the epicentre, they occur over a wide area.

The Banks Peninsula volcanos are long extinct with the last eruptions around 6 or so million years ago. There is no chance of them erupting again as the plate boundary conditions that allowed them to form in the first place no longer exist. 6 Million years is a long time in a volcano sense and volcanism that once existed along the east coast of the south island has long finished. All current and future volcanic activityin NZ will be located in the North Island.

If volcano unrest does occur we see quite different types of earthquakes from what we are seeing now. During volcano unrest we see earthquakes that indicate magma movement which are quite distinct from the tectonic earthquakes we see now.

All the scientific modelling of the data over the last weeks and months shows conclusively that the Canterbury earthquakes are due to fault movement only. There is no volcanic component to them at all. The ground deformation has also been modelled and this shows only fault related movement and nothing to suggest intrusion of magma beneath the Peninsula. Again if this were the case it would produce a quite distinct signatutre much different to what has been recorded.

Any hot springs in the area are also not volcano related, again water that is part of a volcanic system has quite different chemical make up to “non volcanic” hot springs and the 2 can be easily distinguished.

The fact that there are old volcanoes near to where the earthquakes are located is really just coincidence.

But they would say that, wouldn’t they.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.