But is it divisible by 3?

The fascination with ‘significant’ numbers is another thing I can’t get my head around. All the ‘divisible by 3‘, ‘666’, 33 malarkey that people are into is just baffling.

In a comment over at mysteriousnz, farside notes

Hey guys, I thought you’d be all over the Osama execution… Killed by 6 seals on the 66th anniversary of Hitler’s death and shot through the Left eye?

Do these guys even check their facts before making such statements? For starters, there weren’t six seals involved, the number was more like 79 (and a dog). (I think farside is getting confused by the name of the operational unit, which was SEAL team 6 – the navy equivalent of the army’s Delta Force).

Bin Laden was killed on May 2 (Pakistan time). Hitler’s death was the 30th of April.

Undaunted, farside turns to the recent royal wedding…

I don’t even see a mention of the royal wedding coincidentally on the same weekend where 660 guests a 6 bridesmaids & groomsmen assembled to see the pair get married.

There were, in fact, somewhere around 1900 guests at the ceremony.

And eight people in the bridal party: four bridesmaids, two groomsmen, the best man and the maid-of-honor.

However, Kate’s dress did have a 270-centimetre train.

And 270 is divisible by 3!

Make of that what you will.

Advertisements

28 thoughts on “But is it divisible by 3?

  1. MikeC says:

    I feel an earthquake coming in Chch…i’m sure it will be divisible by 3 and aligned with HAARP on NT’s birthday or some days befoer or afte it…..

    • ARE YOU FUCKING CRAZY TO BRING ME BACK? YOU ARE FUCKING STUPID. WAKE THE FUCK UP RETARD. -THE BIBLICAL PROPHET

      At 3:04 am on the 10th May 2011, Christchurch residents awoke to find their city shaking again. The aftershock measured 5.3 on the Richter scale.

      Weary Cantabrians were awoken by a large aftershock that caused widespread alarm and many reports of racing hearts and fears that it was another big one. Canterbury Quake Live reported within minutes that the aftershock had been the eighth equal largest one since the September 4th, 2010 earthquake and the fourth largest since the February 22nd quake.

      Facts About the 5.3 Aftershock in Christchurch

      The 5.3 aftershock on the morning of the 10th May 2011 registered as a 6 on the Mercalli scale. A 6 rating on the Mercalli scale is described as, ‘Felt by everyone. Difficult to stand. Some heavy furniture moved, some plaster falls. Chimneys may be slightly damaged.’ The aftershock was centered in Rolleston at a depth of 14 kilometers and released one kiloton of energy. Its location means it was related to the 7.1 earthquake on the 4th September 2010.

      With the majority of the city being woken by the aftershock, people were on Facebook within minutes. The following comments revealed how the shake had been felt and also the large area it had affected:

      ‘Felt it in Bryndwr…house rattled and shook for quite a while. I was about to go to bed…was up because I couldn’t sleep…now I am really awake….everyone else is snoring!..except the cat..she’s sticking with me…hope everyone is okay!’
      ‘5.3. That was seriously unpleasant to wake up from a deep sleep swearing and thinking the house is gonna cave in (in my half-asleep state of not being able to analyse the shaking) yet not be awake enough to get up and go for cover.’
      ‘Can’t believe how scary that was. How on earth did we cope on Feb 22?’
      ‘In Forest Park – Parklands – Was sharp, severe shaking – & so long rolling to finish off. Now have 3 trucks working on the sewer pipes outside. Good morning Tuesday.’
      ‎’3 kids in tears and they need to be at school at 6.45am (to go to stage challenge) not looking great.’
      Other comments recorded that the shake had been felt as far south as Timaru and Dunedin and across on the west coast in Greymouth. In Christchurch, it was felt as a violent shaking that continued for quite a while, knocked things over and made a loud noise. Homes and buildings rocked and pets were frightened. The early morning news report on TV3 stated that police had immediately been deployed to check buildings but no major damage had been reported.

      • MikeC says:

        “At 3:04 am on the 10th May 2011, Christchurch residents awoke to find their city shaking again. The aftershock measured 5.3 on the Richter scale.”

        Dang – nothing divisible by 3 then??

      • AnonymousATCO says:

        haha the previous post at 3:33pm was completely unintentional, but ominous none the less…

    • You are such a fucking retard. Your lifetime is but a blink of an eye compared with the life of this planet. For you to see the biggest earthquakes ever recorded in the history of this planet in your lifetime is a very slim chance like winning the lotto or being struck by lightning UNLESS EARTHQUAKES ARE INCREASING. Fathom that you have seen these earthquakes in your lifetime and fathom that your stupidity alone earns your eternal spot in hell. Tesla made earthquakes bitch. -Biblical Prophet

      • MikeC says:

        Actually the chances of me “seeing” the biggest earthquakes ever recorded on this planet in my lifetime are quite large – I was alive when the 9.5 hit Chile in 1960, which is the largest one ever recorded.

        so the “chances” of this miraculous event happening are 100% – unity – it has already happened.

        It happened on May 22 – the 142nd day of the year – also not divisible by 3. And 1960 isn’t divisible by 3. At 14:11 hrs local time, 19:11 UTC – neither of which is divisible by 3.

        And the magnitude wasn’t divisble by 3 either.

        Gosh…….what a shame. yawn.

  2. MikeC says:

    Let’s try another approach – the first widely used measurement of earthquake “size” was the Rossi-Forel scale from 1873.

    So the “recorded history” of earthquakes is only about 140 years old.

    I’m 52 – so the chances of me being alive in 1 of those 140 years is 52/140 – or about 37%.

    Not really vanishingly small at all.

    But wait – there’s more!!

    However more to the point – everyone who was alive in 1960 “experinced” that earthquake – many of them would ahve been born in the 1800’s, many of them like me, can expect to still be alive in the 2040’s and perhaps beyond for a few.

    That’s about 2 billion people who had that miniscule chance of experiencing the biggest earthquake ever recorded.

    the total population of people who have ever lived is estimated at about 100 billion in various places – so about 2% of all the people who have ever existed throughout all of time were alive when that earthquake happened.

    2% = 1/50th – not exactly lotto or lightening odds!!

    You really haven’t got much of a clue about the real world! lol

  3. You are fucking blind. Tell me you want another… you fucking pussy. Tell me cunt. Sitting on this thread because on the real thread… where I called the death that took place in your country… where I called the death that took place in your face… BEFORE FEBRUARY 2011
    http://tinyurl.com/mikecisgay
    READ THAT SHIT YOU FUCKING DOUCHEBAG!
    DON’T FORGET OR I WILL HAVE TO REMIND YOU FOREVER.

    • MikeC says:

      Oh yeah I remember yuo saying that ther was gonna be an earthquake in NZ (15,000 a year – pretty safe bet), and I recall you saying “the next big one’s gonna hurt” – which is nice and non-specific so you can then claim to have predicted anything afterwards.

      so yeah – i haven’t forgotten that you are a loud mouthed blowhard who hasn’t got anything to offer the except plagiarised texts, puffed up self importance, and custom printed gifts.

      Have a nice day sweetie! 😉

  4. CNNZ says:

    BP it doesn’t sound like you’ve gone to a doctor to get that mental problem fixed, its never too late make a booking soon you’ll thank me for it.

    • How soon you forget how your February started out…
      CNNZ says:
      February 1, 2011 at 7:03 am
      It didn’t shake three of us as it DID not shake me. I was no where nere the quake! I have never felt a quake in my life!
      It has everything to do with fault lines and nothing to do with Tesla.

      Reply
      Biblical Prophet says:
      February 1, 2011 at 7:12 am
      As you wish… the next will hurt. -Biblical Prophet

      MikeC says:
      February 1, 2011 at 9:04 am
      Apparently not – here’s a list of quakes in the last 60 minutes that we haven’t felt – http://magma.geonet.org.nz/shakenz/alternate.html

      Reply
      Biblical Prophet says:
      February 1, 2011 at 9:10 am
      It will beat the 5.9 divine.
      -Biblical Prophet

      Reply
      MikeC says:
      February 1, 2011 at 9:42 am
      So you are saying he next really big one will hurt?

      Wow – that’s right up there with telling us that rain will get us wet.

      how about stepping out of the realm of the bleedin’ obvious, and provide some specifics?

      Biblical Prophet says:
      February 1, 2011 at 2:55 pm
      It will hurt you. -Biblical Prophet

      MikeC says:
      February 1, 2011 at 3:20 pm
      Biblical Prophet says:
      February 1, 2011 at 2:55 pm
      “It will hurt you”

      Hmm…still not very specific.

      Is that me personally, or “you” as in the “royal you” of all us faggot ass bitches in NZ? And is it physical hurt, financial, or emotional? Or perhaps a combination of all 3?

      Will it hurt anyone else? Or just the 3 of us who dare to call you fool?

      AviateNavigate says:
      February 1, 2011 at 9:09 am
      provide lat/long, epicenter time in NZDT, magnitude, depth. All this should be within your ‘power’

      Reply
      Biblical Prophet says:
      February 1, 2011 at 9:13 am
      I am but a messenger from god with his simple truth.
      Nikola Tesla made earthquakes in Alaska in 1899.
      So saith the lord your god.
      -Biblical Prophet

      • MikeC says:

        So you are finally admitting that you did’t do any more than predict that the next big earthquake would hurt.

        Good for you – glad you’re coming to your senses.

        Can I get a pen with that “fuckwad” comment on it??

      • The Mark of the Beast is calculated by God’s witness who’s social security number is Six Hundred and Sixty-Six. My Social Security Number is Six Hundred and Sixty-Six even though the Social Security Administration tried never to assign that very number.

        The Mark of the Beast is associated with Social Security Number because:

        The Social Security Number is associated with one’s credit which is one’s image.
        In every passage where it mentions the Mark of the Beast, it also mentions worshiping an image of the beast. In trying to understand the mark, we should also at the same time try to understand its association with its image.

        The Social Security Number is in the hand “fingerprints” and on the forehead “facial recognition” which is now instant. Keep in mind that sattelites could count the dimples on a golf ball from outer space decades ago.

        And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: – Revelation 13:16

        And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name. – Revelation 13:17

  5. CNNZ says:

    So you think you did make the earthquakes but i’ll tell you this one more time, i never felt a thing because i don’t live anywhere nere where “you” made the ground shake.

    The only person who likes you is yourself how sad.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s